McNab Park — A Public Accounting
The complete case for what happened to a 74-year-old public park, told in chronological order, every claim cited to a primary source.
A 2.5-acre neighborhood park, dedicated to local veterans in 1952, was leased to the City's redevelopment agency in 2019 for fifty years at ten dollars a year. The agency missed its own four-year deadline almost three years ago. Federal money landed two weeks after the default. The lease has never been declared in default. Every claim on this page is footnoted to a primary source.
McNab Memorial Park is one of the last substantial neighborhood parks in District 1. To its south sits a cemetery. In September 2019, the Pompano Beach Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) signed a 50‑year lease on the northern half of the park, from the City to the CRA, at $10 a year.1
The City Charter — Section 250 — says the disposal of a park requires a vote of the people.2 There was no vote. The voters were given the chance to weaken §250 on November 5, 2024, and they declined: of three local Charter amendments on the ballot, only Amendment #1 passed; Amendments #2 and #3 — which would have loosened lease and contract rules — failed.3
The lease itself sets a deadline. Section 5.1 required the CRA to spend $2,700,000 on Capital Improvements within four years, with at least $1,350,000 within two years. The lease's own words call missing those deadlines a "major breach … entitling the City to all remedies occasioned by default." §5.2 expressly cites City Charter §250 by name.4
That four-year deadline lapsed on September 16, 2023. As of today, that is approximately 975 days ago.
Of the money disclosed to date, only $882,123.69 — the relocation of the McNab House — cleanly qualifies as a §5.1 Capital Improvement. The remainder is pre-construction soft cost: architectural drawings, design, surveys. The architectural contract with Bermello, Ajamil & Partners was at least 87.38% billed as of January 2026.5
On October 1, 2023 — fifteen days after the lease was already in default — the CRA signed a $1,000,000 federal pass-through grant through Florida DEP (Land & Water Conservation Fund), with a National Park Service federal award number of FAIN P23AP01591, committing the project to completion by June 30, 2026.6 That date is less than two months away.
The same person signed both sides of the 2019 lease as City Manager and as CRA Executive Director: Gregory P. Harrison. The same Mayor, Rex Hardin, signed both sides as Mayor of the City and Chair of the CRA.4
And all of this sits on top of a July 20, 2018 City Planning & Zoning staff memo — produced on the City's own network drive, on City equipment, before the public was ever told the project's true shape — that maps the precise rezoning path the August 27, 2025 Public Purpose Adjustment now executes.7
"Option 2: City purchases site, rezones to remove PR, redesignates as Core subarea and MM use area on EOD regulating plans … doesn't require house to be considered part of McNab Park." — July 20, 2018 City Planning & Zoning staff memo, "Land Use and Zoning Analysis," G:\Zoning 2009\Special Projects\ETOC\McNab House Relocation\
That is the case. Everything below is the receipts.
Five years of public statements, captured on camera and in the meeting minutes, made by the people running the project. They are presented in chronological order. Click through to the source.
“A totally public facility.”
Randy Hollingworth, Bermello, Ajamil & Partners.
YouTube (full meeting)
“Open to the public.”
Randy Hollingworth, Bermello, Ajamil & Partners.
YouTube (full meeting)
“As we’ve promised …”
Sarah Mulder, Project Manager, Pompano Beach CRA.
YouTube (ts ~17:27)
“Will always remain a public park.”
Nguyen Tran, CRA Director.
YouTube (ts ~1:29:17)
“Open space … preserve.”
Nguyen Tran, CRA Director.
YouTube
“A restaurant needs 160 seats to be profitable, and I would like to know if the event structure is part of the restaurant, since I believe the McNab House can only hold 80 People tops.”
Resident Tom Drum, Question 14 of 79 to the Bermello, Ajamil stakeholder Zoom (107 unique viewers).8
“I believe you are selling us one thing, and selling us another.”
Resident Tom Drum, Question 57. Five years ago, the public asked the question this page is documenting.8
“The differences between this project and a public park…”
Sarah Mulder, Project Manager, Pompano Beach CRA — ECRA Board minutes, September 4, 2025.10
Four pages from the City’s own files. Each image links to the full source document. Click to read.
Page 2 of the executed September 16, 2019 lease. §3 caps the term per Charter §250(b). §5.1 sets the $2.7M / 4-year deadline. §5.2 sets the $1.35M / 2-year interim. Both are labeled major breach if missed. Full lease PDF →
July 23, 2019 memo from Nguyen Tran (through City Manager Greg Harrison) recommending the lease. The memo never mentions Charter §250 or voter approval — though §5.2 of the lease itself cites §250 by name. Full memo PDF →
July 20, 2018 internal Planning & Zoning memo — written on the City’s own G:\Zoning 2009 drive, on a City computer, before the lease was signed — that maps the exact rezoning path the 2025 PPA now executes. Open in Drive →
February 26, 2025 written DRC responses from the project architect — submitted to City staff months before the August 27, 2025 P&Z hearing. Full responses PDF →
The CRA’s 10‑year operating proforma — provided to the City — is not a park budget. It is a restaurant and events‑venue business plan. In the base case it projects:9
That is the operator’s own document. It is unambiguously the financial model of a commercial restaurant and events venue, sitting on land the Charter still treats as a public park.
The lease did not happen in isolation. Two adjacent transactions, both involving CRA-connected parties, frame it:16
Sources: Florida Bulldog, May 2020; Florida Bulldog, November 2021.
I am one voice on the dais. What follows is a list of public actions that, in my opinion as your District 1 Commissioner, the law and the lease require — not as a punishment, but as a return to the rules everyone agreed to in 2019.
If you would like to read the on-the-record motion text, the question list for the dais, and the Public Records Request list that supports all of this, see the companion document — McNab Park — On-Record Rider — available on request.
Everything on this page is drawn from longer documents in my files. Below are the five written for the public — the complete report, a shorter summary, the verbatim quotes evidence brief, a procedural comparison of what the Planning & Zoning Board heard on August 27, 2025, and a network map of the people, parcels, and contracts that connect to this project. Each is available as a PDF for reading and a Word file for re-use.
The complete case for what happened to a 74-year-old public park, told in chronological order, every claim cited to a primary source.
A condensed report covering original site specifications, the timeline, the financial structure, and the open compliance questions — for stakeholder and community review.
Eight verbatim statements from CRA staff, board members, and the project's design firm — all promising McNab Park would remain a public park — stacked next to the official record showing otherwise.
Three different versions of the same Planning & Zoning Board hearing — what the Legistar record shows, what the City’s own monthly report says, and what the YouTube captions actually captured — with the procedural questions each raises.
A documented map of the people, parcels, and contracts that connect to this project — landowners adjacent to the park, the CRA’s hospitality consultant, the redevelopment-management firm whose principals own the parcel directly across E Atlantic Blvd, the City advisory body where three of the central figures sit together, and the single staff officer in whom Pompano Beach Code §155.2435 vests authority over the Public Purpose Adjustment used by this project. Every name, parcel, and code citation is sourced to Sunbiz, the Broward County Property Appraiser, Legistar, the City’s published HR records, or the Code of Ordinances.